~5 min
vs ~5 days
time to launch kit
pitchkit turns your repo into a promo video, a VC pitch deck, and a landing page — one local CLI your AI agent drives, no cloud, no subscriptions.
Your AI agent walks the README, source, brand assets, and writes a ProductContext — the single brief that drives everything else.
HyperFrames composes HTML scenes, captures Chrome frames into a 1080p mp4, mixes voice + procedural BGM. Local, deterministic, free.
Deck and landing page go to whichever design skill you have — ppt-master, opendesign, design-html. pitchkit only checks the three artifacts say the same thing.
Your code is done. Your demo works. The metric you've been chasing for six months finally went the right way. None of that matters on Friday morning if the promo video is half-finished and the pitch deck is still a Notion doc.
The status quo is three disconnected tools — videographer, SaaS launcher, Carrd template — each of them ignorant of your codebase, each of them charging by the minute. The longer they take, the smaller your launch window gets.
pitchkit treats the launch artifacts as a build artifact: deterministic, scriptable, AI-driven, one source of truth across the three.
Claude Code and Cursor can already reason about a whole repo.
The missing piece was a deterministic media toolkit they could call.
pitchkit is that toolkit.